top of page

Research Blog

Search

Updated: 3 days ago

So it has come to my attention after triggering a state investigation into Microsoft, somebody has written a hit piece about me on substack:


[Substack Hit Piece]


This is in addition to what appeared to be aggressive astroturfing on several subreddits trying to bury my story about Microsoft violations of worker protections (for which now there is a state and federal investigation pending an investigator):



[The Problem with Microsoft]


The hit piece tries to tie me to Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson, DOGE, and the GOP - claiming that I was harassing CUPD to detract from SA victims with personal grievances, and tries to frame me for “vaccine skepticism” and alleged belief in Jewish space lasers. This is in addition to criticism now that since I’m moving to China that means I must be doing something nefarious there too.


Oh boy where to even begin...


🤦‍♂️

[My Blog Response]


The main problem here is that it seems to me that both the right and establishment dems have failed the millennial generation - and smearing people by placing them in a box is designed as a form of control or to discredit detractors of any kind. This whole thing with Microsoft is a microcosm of the issues with the establishment dems in alienating their own base that cost them previous elections because what I’ve actually done is criticize Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson, advocate for Medicare for all, and report declining mental health of students and cocaine sales on campus at CU boulder shortly before a mass shooting and riot of students flipping police cars:


'This was a revolt': CU students blame frustration over COVID-19 restrictions for Saturday's riot


But of course I’m being framed as literally being a part of DOGE with direct ties to Elon Musk allegedly trying to detract from SA victims. Literally the university takes the side of fraternity rapists and I’m being told if I say anything about the corruption on campus, I’m somehow the problem. I was also estranged from some of my immediate evangelical fundamentalist MAGA family and assaulted in my vehicle (police report on the situation) for playing a song about releasing the Epstein files on their street.


Over the years I've seen UC Berkeley devolve into violent protests after a 500 million dollar budget cut, wrongful (possibly in a coverup) terminations from Boeing, and the systematic misuse of institutions - but I guess I'm the bad guy and possibly dangerous for complaining? I don't think so.


Remember when Dr. Jordan Peterson was blowing up on the internet? I talked with Dr. Peterson for an hour, and here is my takeaway.


Young people are feeling alienated and lots of people would like to start a family and even have the traditional roles where the girl doesn't have to work and can just stay at home and volunteer or work on a part time basis in the community. I don't think that the majority of women I've interacted with love going to work to make money.


The problem is that it isn't socioeconomically viable. They feel socioeconomic anxiety and conflicting desires to both attain these traditional markers of adulthood but at the same time can't and are told that the goal itself is harmful in some way or told that they just have an unearned privilege and the way to attain it is by "earning" this "privilege" in a late stage neoliberal hellscape.


Millennials have been failed by both the right and the establishment dems. There was a power vacuum left and then it was filled with toxic alt right figures.


Young men were told that when they felt alienated and anxiety about meeting their needs they should talk to a therapist, and then there was the rise of Jordan Peterson. They were told that they should work on themselves, and then there was the rise of the self help grifter Andrew Tate. They were told that the answer was to vote or protest to have their voices heard and then there was the the rise of Trump.


Now, on the left, establishment dems are more unpopular now than ever. While Trump is invading countries and hiding 3pstein files, on the left there is apathy and vague gesturing towards change and the status quo - an implicit support for the same oppressive systems they claim they are against. It isn't enough to simply be for or against the other color team - you must act.


Instead of young guys "forcing women" to do anything you could... like...pay Millennials properly? Hold powerful people accountable? Just a thought and one main reason young women feel anxiety about having kids or about not working constantly in the rat race - it turns out that many young women do want a relationship where they do not have to work, support so that they can stay at home *if they want to*, and contrary to the propaganda - most Millennials did want kids.


Both men and women just don't want to feel like trapped slaves and to do so on their own terms with the socioeconomic stability and mobility to do so. Extreme take?


I don't know why the conversation is usually framed as young guys must either remain in unstable and precarious relationships / not have any intimacy or force women to do anything - it turns out that you don't tend to have either issue when the older generation is just paying them to do what they want consensually instead.


Maybe the conversation is just to avoid the fact that most of the wealth of the older generation is stored in overinflated NIMBY housing valuations they don't want to give up to actually fix the problem? 🤔


The irony is that I have been personally affected by budget cuts - when I attended UC Berkeley there was a 500 million dollar budget cut leaving students to fall through the cracks - leaving 10% of the students homeless while attending. There was a violent confrontation between protestors and police - I left the campus and in spite of not being on academic probation I was denied re-entry. The irony is that I've been framed as participating in wrongful terminations of government employees when I've spearheaded a campaign to hold big tech companies accountable for wrongful terminations.



  • Writer: Trevor Alexander Nestor
    Trevor Alexander Nestor
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • 5 min read

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

I remember after the Bush years there was a strong new atheist movement that intersected alot with the technological utopian vibe at the time, with prominent figures like Neil Degrasse Tyson, TJ Kirk, Richard Dawkins, the Armored Skeptic, Holy Koolaid, the Genetically Modified Skeptic, Aaron Ra, the Drunken Peasants Podcast, Bill Nye, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, and so forth. But it seems like the whole thing as a cultural and political force has died off, and was not successful. So given this - it might be appropriate to ask - what went wrong?


Right now more than ever I think that something is needed in the age of Trump, political instability and violence, and hyperpolarization, but if we do not take a closer look at failed movements of the past, it will be possible to fall into the same traps.



While religion was used in a nefarious way to rationalize wars, dehumanization, the massive accumulation of wealth and power, and stripping rights from ordinary people, I think the final stage of the new atheist movement right now is culminating and playing out with techno feudalism, and people are burned out with secularism and science especially after covid and Elon Musk because they have not made much meaningful progress in their personal lives, and general societal ills like lack of access to education, healthcare, childcare, and functional infrastructure are all out of reach for many. The utopian future we were promised has not been delivered.


We were told that our struggles were mental problems, and we saw the rise of Dr. Peterson. We were told we needed to work on ourselves, then we saw the rise of Andrew Tate. We were told the answers were in science and technology, and we saw the rise of Elon Musk. We were told that the solution was political and democratic, and we saw the rise of Donald Trump.


We are more productive now than ever, but the gains are not distributed across workers.
We are more productive now than ever, but the gains are not distributed across workers.
Our current trajectory is not socioeconomically sustainable, putting increasing strain on the young or the need to import or outsource foreign labor.
Our current trajectory is not socioeconomically sustainable, putting increasing strain on the young or the need to import or outsource foreign labor.
For the majority of workers, the American Dream is an exponentially deferred promise - but faith in it is needed to prop up the economic engine.
For the majority of workers, the American Dream is an exponentially deferred promise - but faith in it is needed to prop up the economic engine.

Anxiety about the future is also reflected in lower birth rates creating a death spiral because the population is aging and becoming more socially repressive - all while there is rising wealth and income inequality that has reached a fever pitch.





Prominent academics in the sciences now are even admitting financial incentives have wrecked academia and scientific establishments have become dogmatic.



I have tried to really spend time to articulate what went wrong and how to fix it, and I think that the way forward has to be realizing the ways in which technology has been weaponized, and embracing what makes us human. I argue that AIs are not conscious, and the investments in AI infrastructure and cryptocurrencies reach a tipping point after which there are diminishing returns (like described by sociologist Joseph Tainter). I think that these kinds of analyses are so crucial right now because without a theory for what is going on, it will be easy for people to fall into extremist traps like authoritarian religious or political movements.






The way I am trying to understand things is through the lens of sociophysics, econophysics, complexity economics, luhmann's systems theory, complex adaptive systems theory, agent network model theory, and the spectral theory of value. With this framework you can understand political polarization like you understand the collapse of stars into black holes - you can get what is called a fold catastrophe - a point where the UV and IR regimes collapse by gravity into a singularity. This reflects the collapse of the political spectrum into either civil war/revolution or violent imperialism, which I believe is the proper interpretation of the "technological singularity," where these AIs are simply a reflection of us.


Fold catastrophe points signal the collapse of the political spectrum into authoritarian movements.
Fold catastrophe points signal the collapse of the political spectrum into authoritarian movements.

What is interesting is at the top echelons of society, I do believe this is how they are viewing things too.



The performative left right political spectrum are both beholden to corporate and political elites increasingly more detached from the needs of ordinary people, with culture wars manufactured to divide the public among itself - enforced and entrenched by social media.


The pursuit towards the American Dream is how they keep the economic engine running, it's designed to be an exponential energy gap - a moving goalpost - that way they can tap into sublimated sexual desire to keep things propped up. Actors and actresses and a hidden club of elites write the social scripts we are expected to live by, and consent of the public is manufactured where you are the product. This is not a conspiracy theory - this is all public knowledge - all you have to do is look. The only difference is now, people are no longer willing to play along, because the social contact has been violated.


That there is a group of elites running society is not a conspiracy theory, it is common knowledge.  Even prominent figures like Hawking and Chomsky appear to have affiliations to a hidden network of players.
That there is a group of elites running society is not a conspiracy theory, it is common knowledge. Even prominent figures like Hawking and Chomsky appear to have affiliations to a hidden network of players.




Planners use the same maths of black holes to develop cryptocurrencies which separates social and economic institutions by enforcing one way flows of information. String theory - the leading theory of quantum gravity - was appropriated towards developing cryptography and the maths used to structure society - and one reason that it has been funded so extensively while remaining unfalsifiable, are exactly these perverse incentives (the black hole information paradox, for example, includes the maths of one way flows of information - precisely the maths appropriated towards developing cryptocurrencies and cryptosystems - and the "extra dimensions" of string theory map to conputational complexity classes and thus socioeconomic class structure within complexity economics theory).





Sam Altman is literally correct, though probably not in the way you were thinking.
Sam Altman is literally correct, though probably not in the way you were thinking.
The theory of entropic gravity describes gravity as emergent from reaching saturation points in entanglement entropy or complexity. Is it possible for societies to eventually collapse in on themselves by the same mechanism?
The theory of entropic gravity describes gravity as emergent from reaching saturation points in entanglement entropy or complexity. Is it possible for societies to eventually collapse in on themselves by the same mechanism?

Agents in the complex interdependent system we all live in facilitate information flows between social and economic institutions and the complexity of information they facilitate corresponds to their socioeconomic class (computational complexity class/chomsky hierarchy/kolmogorov complexity) under these models. Metanarratives and symbols are developed to control and survellience people under ulterior pretexts (climate change, pandemics, terrorism, antifa violence, AI, etc).


Since AIs are not conscious, and are simply a reflection of us, they reach scaling limits - they tap into the collective creativity of a culture - they feed on us interpreting their results and what we create and intuit - and after a few iterations of feeding on their own outputs start producing garbled garbage.


The investment into AI systems reaches a point of diminishing returns.
The investment into AI systems reaches a point of diminishing returns.

What is interesting though, is that if Penrose is correct, we may already inherently have within us a latent ability to outperform these AIs and even emergent quantum computer technologies - challenging our strategy towards allocating the immense resources towards scaling up these datacenters and cryptocurrency systems and quantum computers. If Penrose is correct, our own natural brains are quantum computers that outclass all of the ones we have built, and at a staggering efficiency of only 20 watts a pop.


This forces us to reconsider our collective future. If our own brains outclass all of these AIs and quantum computers, and if our brains are quantum computers and quantum computers allow us to crack cryptocurrencies, then, wouldn't a better way to allocate resources be in direct investments into local communities and people?



Can people really be replaced by AI, or is AI just a rationalization for greed?
Can people really be replaced by AI, or is AI just a rationalization for greed?

If Penrose's theory of consciousness is correct, that implies it might be possible to solve economic optimization problems not with expensive quantum computer hardware - but by means of social networks of people alone.
If Penrose's theory of consciousness is correct, that implies it might be possible to solve economic optimization problems not with expensive quantum computer hardware - but by means of social networks of people alone.

At a saturation point, diminishing returns by means of scaling up AI do not keep pace with resource cost
At a saturation point, diminishing returns by means of scaling up AI do not keep pace with resource cost

Billions of dollars are pouring into AI, quantum computing, and cryptography - all for alleged economic benefits and increases in productivity. While people struggle to afford necessities like housing, childcare, healthcare, and education, Mark Zuckerberg announces he plans on building AI datacenters the size of Manhattan - economic planning you have no part in developing the vision for.



The reason this is a collosal waste of resources is that the brain is vastly more efficient then any of these systems - so from a purely economic and computational perspective, it would actually be better to invest directly in infrastructure and local communities.


If you feel that there haven't been many improvements at home, a part of the problem is that we are all expected to live in digital prisons and none of the money is going towards housing, education, healthcare, infrastructure, or childcare. Under the guise of technological progress, all other things are sacrificed while all power is concentrated in the hands of those that control the mass surveillance and information control apparatus.
If you feel that there haven't been many improvements at home, a part of the problem is that we are all expected to live in digital prisons and none of the money is going towards housing, education, healthcare, infrastructure, or childcare. Under the guise of technological progress, all other things are sacrificed while all power is concentrated in the hands of those that control the mass surveillance and information control apparatus.

Take the thesis of Dr. Penrose, who claims that the brain is a quantum computer that processes information by means of gravity - accounting for the measurement problem:






If his theory is correct, than it should be feasible to break postquantum lattice cryptography, and also build a scalable quantum computer by means of trophic social networks of people alone:



We also know that societies reach entropic limits of complexity after which they collapse because institutions become too complex to maintain (according to sociologist Joseph Tainter). In this view, it is more efficient to invest directly in people, local communities, and infrastructure than ever more complicated AI systems after a tipping point (which in post industrial societies is a bit after the point of financialization of the economy).








This also explains why overreliance on AI as an information survelliance and control loop in organizations after a saturation point of complexity can be their own downfall, like at Microsoft:




Currently the only likely value for further investments in this technology will be the discharge of debts through devaluation as the AI bubble pops.




My Story

Get to Know Me

I have been on many strange adventures traveling off-grid around the world which has contributed to my understanding of the universe and my dedication towards science advocacy, housing affordability, academic integrity, and education funding. From witnessing Occupy Cal amid 500 million dollar budget cuts to the UC system, to corporate and government corruption and academic gatekeeping, I decided to achieve background independence and live in a trailer "tiny home" I built so that I would be able to pursue my endeavors.

Contact
Information

Information Physics Institute

University of Portsmouth, UK

PO Box 7299

Bellevue, WA 98008-1299

1 720-322-4143

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Thanks for submitting!

©2025 by Trevor Nestor 

bottom of page